Abstract
It should be noted that the official version of the scale is the French one. The English version, published for convenience, has been authorized by the Comité Consultatif de Thermométrie and approved by the Comité International des Poids et Mesures.
The International Temperature Scale of 1990 was adopted by the Comité International des Poids et Mesures at its meeting in 1989, in accordance with the request embodied in Resolution 7 of the [8th Conference Générale des Poids et Mesures of 1987. This scale supersedes the International Practical Temperature Scale of 1968 (amended edition of 1975) and the 1976 Provisional to Temperature Scale.
The International Temperature Scale of 1990 (ITS-90)
1. Units of temperature
The unit of the fundamental physical quantity known as thermo-dynamic temperature, symbol , is the kelvin, symbol , defined as the fraction of the thermodynamic temperature of the triple point of water1.
Because of the way earlier temperature scales were defined, it remains common practice to express a temperature in terms of its difference from , the ice point. A thermodynamic temperature, , expressed in this way is known as a Celsius temperature, symbol , defined by:
(1)
The unit of Celsius temperature is the degree Celsius, symbol , which is by definition equal in magnitude to the kelvin. A difference of temperature may be expressed in kelvins or degrees Celsius.
The International Temperature Scale of 1990 (ITS-90) defines both International Kelvin Temperatures, symbol , and International Celsius Temperatures, symbol . The relation between and is the same as that between and , i.e.:
(2)
The unit of the physical quantity is the kelvin, symbol , and the unit of the physical quantity is the degree Celsius, symbol , as is the case for the thermodynamic temperature and the Celsius temperature .
2. Principles of the International Temperature Scale of 1990 (ITS-90)
The ITS-90 extends upwards from to the highest temperature practicably measurable in terms of the Planck radiation law using monochromatic radiation. The ITS-90 comprises a number of ranges and sub-ranges throughout each of which temperatures are defined. Several of these ranges or sub-ranges overlap, and where such overlapping occurs, differing definitions of exist: these differing definitions have equal status. For measurements of the very highest precision there may be detectable numerical differences between measurements made at the same temperature but in accordance with differing definitions. Similarly, even using one definition, at a temperature between defining fixed points two acceptable interpolating instruments (e.g. resistance thermometers) may give detectably differing numerical values of . In virtually all cases these differences are of negligible practical importance and are at the minimum level consistent with a scale of no more than reasonable complexity: for further information on this point, see « Supplementary Information for the ITS-90 »2.
The ITS-90 has been constructed in such a way that, throughout its range, for any given temperature the numerical value of is a close approximation to the numerical value of according to best estimates at the time the scale was adopted. By comparison with direct measurements of thermodynamic temperatures, measurements of are more easily made, are more precise and are highly reproducible.
There are significant numerical differences between the values of and the corresponding values of measured on the International Practical Temperature Scale of 1968 (IPTS-68), see Figure 1 and Table 6. Similarly there were differences between the IPTS-68 and the International Practical Temperature Scale of 1948 (IPTS-48), and between the
International Temperature Scale of 1948 (ITS-48) and the International Temperature Scale of 1927 (ITS-27). See the Appendix and, for more detailed information, « Supplementary Information for the ITS-90 ».
3. Definition of the International Temperature Scale of 1990
Between and is defined in terms of the vapour-pressure temperature relations of 3He and 4He.
Between and the triple point of neon () is defined by means of a helium gas thermometer calibrated at three experimentally realizable temperatures having assigned numerical values (defining fixed points) and using specified interpolation procedures.
Between the triple point of equilibrium hydrogen () and the freezing point of silver () is defined by means of platinum resistance thermometers calibrated at specified sets of defining fixed points and using specified interpolation procedures.
Above the freezing point of silver () is defined in terms of a defining fixed point and the Planck radiation law.
The defining fixed points of the ITS-90 are listed in Table 1. The effects of pressure, arising from significant depths of immersion of the sensor or from other causes, on the temperature of most of these points are given in Table 2.
3.1. From to : helium vapour-pressure temperature equations
In this range is defined in terms of the vapour pressure of 3He and 4He using equations of the form:
(3)
The values of the constants , , and are given in Table 3 for 3He in the range of to , and for 4He in the ranges to (the point) and to .
3.2. From to the triple point of neon (): gas thermometer
In this range is defined in terms of a 3He or a 4He gas thermometer of the constant-volume type that has been calibrated at three temperatures. These are the triple point of neon (), the triple point of equilibrium hydrogen (), and a temperature between and . This last temperature is determined using a 3He or a 4He vapour pressure thermometer as specified in Section 3.1.
Table 1. Defining fixed points of the ITS-90
Number | Temperature | Substancea | Stateb | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 3 to 5 | to | He | ||
2 | e-H2 | ||||
3 | e-H2 (or He) | (or ) | |||
4 | e-H2 (or He) | (or ) | |||
5 | Ne | ||||
6 | O2 | ||||
7 | Ar | ||||
8 | Hg | ||||
9 | H2O | ||||
10 | Ga | M | |||
11 | In | ||||
12 | Sn | ||||
13 | Zn | ||||
14 | Al | ||||
15 | Ag | ||||
16 | Au | ||||
17 | Cu | ||||
a All substances except 3He are of natural isotopic composition; e-H2 is hydrogen at the equilibrium concentration of the ortho- and para-molecular forms. b For advice on the realization of these various states. see « Supplementary Information for the ITS-90 »; Symbols have the following meanings: : vapour pressure point: : triple point (temperature at which the solid, liquid and vapour phases are in equilibrium): : gas thermometer point: , : melting point, freezing point (temperature. at a pressure of , at which the solid and liquid phases are in equilibrium). |
Table 2. Effect of pressure on the temperatures of some defining fixed points3
Substance | Assigned value of equilibrium temperature | Temperature variation | |
---|---|---|---|
with pressure | with detph | ||
e-Hydrogen () | |||
Neon () | |||
Oxygen () | |||
Argon () | |||
Mercury () | |||
Water () | |||
Gallium | |||
Indium | |||
Tin | |||
Zinc | |||
Aluminium | |||
Silver | |||
Gold | |||
Copper | |||
a Equivalent to millikelvins per standard atmosphere. b Equivalent to millikelvins per metre of liquid. |
Table 3. Values of the constants for the helium vapour pressure Equation (3), and the temperature range for which each equation, identified by its set of constants, is valid
3He to | 4He to | 4He to | |
---|---|---|---|
0 | |||
0 | 0 | ||
3.2.1. From to the triple point of neon () with 4He as the thermometric gas
In this range is defined by the relation:
(4)
where is the pressure in the gas thermometer and , and are coefficients the numerical values of which are obtained from measurements made at the three defining fixed points given in Section 3.2, but with the further restriction that the lowest one of these points lics between and ,
3.2.2. From to the triple point of neon () with 3He or 4He as the thermometric gas
For a 3He gas thermometer, and for a 4He gas thermometer used below , the non-ideality of the gas must be accounted for explicitly, using the appropriate second virial coefficient or . In this tange is defined by the relation:
(5)
where is the pressure in the gas thermometer, , and are coefficients the numerical values of which are obtained from measurements at three defining temperatures as given in Section 3.2, is the gas density with being the quantity of gas and the volume of the bulb, is 3 or 4 according to the isotope used, and the values of the second virial coefficients are given by the relations:
For 3He,
(6a)
For 4He,
(6b)
The accuracy with which can be realized using Equation (4) and Equation (5) depends on the design of the gas thermometer and the gas density used, Design criteria and current good practice required to achieve a selected accuracy are given in « Supplementary Information for the ITS-90 ».
3.3. The triple point of equilibrium hydrogen () to the freezing point of silver (): platinum resistance thermometer
In this range is defined by means of a platinum resistance thermometer calibrated at specified sets of defining fixed points, and using specified reference and deviation functions for interpolation at intervening temperatures.
No single platinum resistance thermometer can provide high accuracy, or is even likely to be usable, over all of the temperature range to . The choice of temperature range, or ranges, from among those listed below for which a particular thermometer can be used is normally limited by its construction.
For practical details and current good practice, in particular concerning types of thermometer available, their acceptable operating ranges, probable accuracies, permissible leakage resistance, resistance values, and thermal treatment, see « Supplementary Information for the ITS-90 ». It is particularly important to take account of the appropriate heat treatments that should be followed cach time a platinum resistance thermometer is subjected to a temperature above about .
Temperatures are determined in terms of the ratio of the resistance at a temperature , and the resistance at the triple point of water. This ratio, , is4:
(7)
An acceptable plalinum resistance thermometer must be made from pure, strain-free platinum, and it must satisfy at least one of the following two relations;
(8a)
(8b)
An acceptable platinum resistance thermometer that is to be used up to the freezing point of silver must also satisfy the relation;
(8c)
In cach of the resistance thermometer ranges, is obtained from as given by the appropriate reference function {Equation (9b) or Equation (10b)}, and the deviation . At the defining fixed points this deviation is obtained directly from the calibration of the thermometer; at intermediate temperatures it is obtained by means of the appropriate deviation function {Equation (12), Equation (13) and Equation (14)}.
For the range to the following reference function is defined:
(9a)
An inverse function, equivalent to Equation (9a) to within , is:
(9b)
The values of the constants , , and are given in Table 4.
A thermometer may be calibrated for use throughout this range or, using progressively fewer calibration points, for ranges with low temperature limits of , and , all having an upper limit of .
For the range to the following reference function is defined:
(10a)
An inverse function, equivalent to Equation (10a) to within , is:
(10b)
The values of the constants , , and , are given in Table 4.
A thermometer may be calibrated for use throughout this range or, using fewer calibration points, for ranges with upper limits of , , , or , all having a lower limit of .
Table 4. Platinum resistance thermometer. The constants , ; , ; , ; and in the reference finetion of equations Equation (9a); Equation (9b); Equation (10a); and Equation (10b) respectively
A thermometer may be calibrated for use in the range to , the calibration being made at these temperatures and at the triple point of water. Both reference functions {Equation (9a)-Equation (9b) and Equation (10a)-Equation (10b)} are required to cover this range.
The defining fixed points and deviation functions for the various ranges are given below, and in summary form in Table 5,
Table 5. Deviation functions and calibration points for platinum resistance thermometers in the various ranges in which they define
(a) Ranges with an upper limit of | |||
---|---|---|---|
Section | Lower limit | Deviation functions | Calibration pointsa |
Section 3.3.1 | 2 to 9 | ||
Section 3.3.1.1 | As for Section 3.3.1 with and | 2, 5 to 9 | |
Section 3.3.1.2 | As for Section 3.3.1 with and | 6 to 9 | |
Section 3.3.1.3 | 7 to 9 | ||
(b) Ranges with a lower limit of | |||
Section | Upper limit | Deviation functions | Calibration pointsa |
Section 3.3.2b | 9, 12 to 15 | ||
Section 3.3.2.1 | As for Section 3.3.2 with | 9, 12 to 14 | |
Section 3.3.2.2 | As for Section 3.3.2 with | 9, 12, 13 | |
Section 3.3.2.3 | As for Section 3.3.2 with | 9, 11, 12 | |
Section 3.3.2.4 | As for Section 3.3.2 with | 9, 11 | |
Section 3.3.2.5 | As for Section 3.3.2 with | 9, 10 | |
(c) Range from () to | |||
Section 3.3.3 | As for Section 3.3.2 with | 8 to 10 | |
a See Table 1. b Calibration points 9. 12 to 14 are used with for : the values of , and thus obtained are retained for , with being determined from calibration point 15. |
3.3.1. The triple point of equilibrium hydrogen () to the triple point of water ()
The thermometer is calibrated at the triple points of equilibrium hydrogen (), neon (), oxygen (), argon (), mercury (), and water (), and at two additional temperatures close to and . These last two may be determined cither: by using a gas thermometer as described in Section 3.2, in which case the two temperatures must lie within the ranges , to and to respectively; or by using the vapour pressure-temperature relation of equilibrium hydrogen, in which case the two temperatures must lie within the ranges to and to respectively, with the precise valucs being determined from Equation (11a) and Equation (11b) respectively:
(11a)
(11b)
The deviation function is5:
(12)
with values for the coefficients , and , being obtained from measurements at the defining fixed points and with .
For this range and for the sub-ranges Section 3.3.1.1 to Section 3.3.1.3 the required values of are obtained from Equation (9a) or from Table 1.
3.3.1.1. The triple point of neon () to the triple point of water ()
The thermometer is calibrated at the triple points of equilibrium hydrogen (), neon (), oxygen (), argon (), mercury () and water ().
The deviation function is given by Equation (12) with values for the coefficients , , , and being obtained from measurements at the defining fixed points and with .
3.3.1.2. The triple point of oxygen () to the triple point of water ()
The thermometer is calibrated at the triple points of oxygen (), argon (), mercury () and water ().
The deviation function is given by Equation (12) with values for the coefficients , and , being obtained from measurements at the defining fixed points, with and with .
3.3.1.3. The triple point of argon () to the triple point of water ()
The thermometer is calibrated at the triple points of argon (), mercury () and water ().
The deviation function is:
(13)
with the values of a and b being obtained from measurements at the defining fixed points.
3.3.2. From to the freezing point of silver ()
The thermometer is calibrated at the triple point of water (), and at the freezing points of tin (), zinc (), aluminium () and silver (),
The deviation function is:
(14)
For temperatures below the freezing point of aluminium , with the values of , and being determined from the measured deviations from at the freezing points of tin, zinc and aluminium. From the freezing point of aluminium to the freezing point of silver the above values of , and are retained and the value of d is determined from the measured deviation from at the freezing point of silver.
For this range and for the sub-ranges Section 3.3.2.1 to Section 3.3.2.5 the required values for are obtained from Equation (10a) or from Table 1.
3.3.2.1. From to the freezing point of aluminium ()
The thermometer is calibrated at the triple point of water (), and at the freezing points of tin (), zinc () and aluminium ().
The deviation function is given by Equation (14), with the values of , and being determined from measurements at the defining fixed points and with .
3.3.2.2. From to the freezing point of zine ()
The thermometer is calibrated at the triple point of water (), and at the freezing points of tin () and zine (),
The deviation function is given by Equation (14), with the values of a and being obtained from measurements at the defining fixed points and with ,
3.3.2.3. From to the freezing point of tin ()
The thermometer is calibrated at the triple point of water (), and at the freezing points of indium (), and tin (),
The deviation function is given by Equation (14), with the values of a and being obtained from measurements at the defining fixed points and with .
3.3.2.4. From to the freezing point of indium ()
The thermometer is calibrated at the triple point of water (), and at the freezing point of indium ().
The deviation function is given by Equation (14), with the value of a being obtained from measurements at the defining fixed points and with ,
3.3.2.5. From to the melting point of gallium ()
The thermometer is calibrated at the triple point of water (), and at the melting point of gallium (),
The deviation function is given by Equation (14), with the value of a being obtained from measurements at the defining fixed points and with .
3.3.3. The triple point of mercury () to the melting point of gallium ()
The thermometer is calibrated at the triple points of mercury (). and water (), and at the melting point of gallium ().
The deviation function is given by Equation (14), with the values of a and b being obtained from measurements at the defining fixed points and with .
The required values of are obtained from Equation (9a) and Equation (10a) for measurements below and above respectively, or from Table 1,
3.4. The range above the freezing point of silver (): Planck radiation law
Above the freezing point of silver the temperature is defined by the equation:
(15)
where refers to any one of the silver , the gold or the copper freezing points6 and in which and are the spectral concentrations of the radiance of a blackbody at the wavelength (in vacuo) at and at respectively, and .
For practical details and current good practice for optical pyrometry, see « Supplementary Information for the ITS-90 »,
4. Supplementary information and differences from earlier scales
The apparatus, methods and procedures that will serve to realize the ITS-90 are given in « Supplementary Information for the ITS-90 », This document also gives an account of the carlier International Temperature Scales and the numerical differences between successive scales that include, where practicable, mathematical functions for the differences . A number of useful approximations to the ITS-90 are given in « Techniques for Approximating the ITS-90 »2.
The two documents have been prepared by the Comité Consultatif de Thermométrie and are published by the BIPM; they are revised and updated periodically.
The differences are shown in Figure 1 and Table 6. The number of significant figures given in Table 6 allows smooth interpolations to be made. However, the reproducibility of the IPTS-68 is, in many areas, substantially worse than is implied by this number.
Figure 1 — Difference between ITS-90 and IPTS-98.
Table 6. Differences between ITS-90 and EPT-76, and between ITS-90 and IPTS-68 for specified values of and
a | ||||||||||
a A discontinuity in the first derivative of occurs at a temperature of , al which . |
Appendix 1. APPENDIX
A1.1. The International Temperature Scale of 1927 (ITS-27)
The International Temperature Scale of 1927 was adopted by the, seventh Conférence Générale des Poids et Mesures to overcome the practical difficulties of the direct realization of thermodynamic temperatures by gas thermometry, and as a universally acceptable replacement for the differing existing national temperature scales. The ITS-27 was formulated so as to allow measurements of temperature to be made precisely and reproducibly, with as close an approximation to thermodynamic temperatures as could be determined at that time. Between the oxygen boiling point and the gold freezing point it was based upon a number of reproducible temperatures, or fixed points, to which numerical values were assigned, and two standard interpolating instruments. Each of these interpolating instruments was calibrated at several of the fixed points. this giving the constants for the interpolating formula in the appropriate temperature range. A platinum resistance thermometer was used for the lower part and a platinum rhodium/platinum thermocouple for temperatures above . For the region above the gold freezing point, temperatures were defined in terms of the Wien radiation law: in practice, this invariably resulted in the selection of an optical pyrometer as the realizing instrument.
A1.2. The International Temperature Scale of 1948 (ITS-48)
The International Temperature Scale of 1948 was adopted by the ninth Conférence Générale. Changes from the ITS-27 were: the lower limit of the platinum resistance thermometer range was changed from to the defined oxygen boiling point of , and the junction of the platinum resistance thermometer range and the thermocouple range became the measured antimony freezing point (about ) in place of ; the silver freezing: point was defined as being instead of ; the gold freezing point replaced the gold melting point (); the Planck radiation law replaced the Wien law; the value assigned to the second radiation constant became in place of ; the permitted ranges for the constants of the interpolation formulae for the standard resistance thermometer and thermocouple were modified; the limitation on for optical pyrometry () was changed to the requirement that « visible » radiation be used.
A1.3. The International Practical Temperature Scale of 1948 (Amended Edition of 1960) (IPTS-48)
The International Practical Temperature Scale of 1948, amended edition of 1960, was adopted by the eleventh Conférence Générale: the tenth Conférence Générale had already adopted the triple point of water as the sole point defining the kelvin, the unit of thermodynamic temperature. In addition to the introduction of the word « Practical », the modifications to the JTS-48 were: the triple point of water, defined as being , replaced the melting point of ice as the calibration’ point in this region; the freezing point of zinc, defined as being , became a preferred alternative to the sulphur boiling point () as a calibration point; the permitted ranges for the constants of the interpolation formulae for the standard resistance thermometer and the thermocouple were further modified; the restriction to « visible » radiation for optical pyrometry was removed.
Inasmuch as the numerical values of temperature on the IPTS-48 were the same as on the ITS-48, the former was not a revision of the scale of 1948 but merely an amended form of it.
A1.4. The International Practical Temperature Scale of 1968 (IPTS-68)
In 1968 the Comité International des Poids et Mesures promulgated the International Practical Temperature Scale of 1968, having been empowered to do so by the thirteenth Conférence Générale of 1967-1968. The IPTS-68 incorporated very extensive changes from the IPTS-48. These included numerical changes, designed to bring it more nearly in accord with thermodynamic temperatures, that were sufficiently large to be apparent to many users. Other changes were as follows: the Jower limit of the scale was extended down to ; at even lower temperatures ( to ), the use of two helium vapour pressure scales was recommended; six new defining fixed points were introduced — the triple point of equilibrium hydrogen (), an intermediate equilibrium hydrogen point (), the normal boiling point of equilibrium hydrogen (), the boiling point of neon (), the triple point of oxygen (), and the freezing point of tin () which became a permitted altcrnative to the boiling point of water; the boiling point of sulphur was deleted; the values assigned to four fixed points were changed — the boiling point of oxygen (), the freezing point of zinc (), the freezing point of silver (), and the freezing point of gold (); the interpolating formulae for the resistance thermometer range became much more complex; the value assigned to the second radiation constant c, became ; the permitted ranges of the constants for the interpolation formulae for the resistance thermometer and thermocouple were again modified.
A1.5. The International Practical Temperature Scale of 1968 (Amended Edition of 1975) (IPTS-68)
The International Practical Temperature Scale of 1968, amended edition of 1975, was adopted by the fifteenth Conférence Générale in 1975. As was the case for the IPTS-48 with respect to the ITS-48, the IPTS-68 (75) introduced no numerical changes. Most of the extensive textual changes were intended only to clarify and simplify its use. More substantive changes were: the oxygen point was defined as the condensation point rather than the boiling point; the triple point of argon () was introduced as a permitted alternative to the condensation point of oxygen; new values of the isotopic composition of naturally occurring neon were adopted; the recommendation to use values of given by the 1958 3He and 1962 3He vapour-pressure scales was rescinded.
A1.6. The 1976 Provisional to Temperature Scale (EPT-76)
The 1976 Provisional to Temperature Scale was introduced to meet two important requirements: these were to provide means of substantially reducing the errors (with respect to corresponding thermodynamic values) below that were then known to exist in the IPTS-68 and throughout the temperature ranges of the 4He and 3He vapour pressure scales of 1958 and 1962 respectively, and to bridge the gap between and in which there had not previously been an international scale. Other objectives in devising the EPT-76 were « that it should be thermodynamically smooth, that it should be continuous with the IPTS-68 at , and that is should agree with thermodynamic temperature as closely as these two conditions allow ». In contrast with the IPTS-68, and to ensure its rapid adoption, several methods of realizing the EPT-76 were approved. These included: using a thermodynamic interpolation instrument and one or more of eleven assigned reference points; taking differences from the IPTS-68 above ; taking differences from helium vapour pressure scales below ; and taking differences from certain well-established laboratory scales. Because there was a certain « lack of internal consistency » it was admitted that « slight ambiguities between realizations » might be introduced. However the advantages gained by adopting the EPT-76 as a working scale until such time as the IPTS-68 should be revised and extended were considered to outweigh the disadvantages.